here it is i believe, that last–scary–trendline for gold

3 increasing trendlines, and from the 108-110 area, there are no more sellers. everyone is being squeezed that is jumping in early, everyone who sells their longs regrets it a day later. commercials have not changed their positions. how does the story end?

Every time we have seen the gold market get this far extended from the 10 week (50 day) moving average, we see at least 10% moves in the other direction. this could take us back to breakout levels where the market already found support there. that would be at the least reasonable, and the best case scenario i could think of for gold bugs.

COT report wont provide much comfort though. the last time Commercials have been this opposed to large traders and small specs…March 2008. Thankfully though, there arent any cheesy commercials about gold that remind one of real estate commercials in the early 2000’s or tech stocks in the late 90’s (insert sarcastic tone)

Being able to predict the future is certainly a desirable trait when trading markets. after-all, that would give you an all but certain edge. however, looking into the future is like looking into the distance.

Assuming one has 20/20 vision or glasses to compensate; you can generally see things in detail that are close to you. but the further out in distance the objects become, your eyes can see less and less detail. All thats left is an outline.

This is like looking into the future.

I can tell you with some decent odds the sun will rise tomorrow, and every day for the next thousand years. There will be oxygen on earth and so forth. if i add just the slightest hint of detail though, it becomes a lot less certain. Where will human civilization be in one thousand years? Will there be a greater or fewer number of species on the planet? Imagine getting into which countries will be more powerful? or which species will be extinct? God forbid we seek any more detail!

This gives us a framework for how to view the markets. when looking long term, very basis and general themes need only apply. get a little bit shorter–say, cyclical trends,–then maybe we add a long term trendfollowing system. the closer we get, the more details we can add to our predictions.

The message is simple; if youre a long term trader dont worry about so many details. one retail sales report wont kill the more general things about the market/economy/geopolitics etc. if youre a short term trader, specifically daytrader, then use these details because you can actually see them.

This can also help you decide what kind of trading fits your personality. if youre detail oriented, you might very well excell at short term trading. if you prefer generalizations and a birds-eye view, perhaps longer term will be more aligned with your personality. This wont be true all the time, only a roadmap to see into the distance.

Gold is getting scary. As someone who rides trends, im long and remain long to spite that comment. but this is something to watch for.

If a third, steeper trendline develops, then one must watch that. For whatever the reason, probably as much physics as psychology, when a third progressively steeper trendline develops on a chart (up or down) when that third trendline breaks, the trend usually breaks.  one should also continue this analysis by looking at the triangle break in 2007 and the 3 steeper trendlines that it followed (and then look at what im about to talk about).

The fundamentals.

since i cant find a way to put the chart on here, readers will need to do some work. go to TimingCharts.com and then look up COMEX GOLD. from there you want a 5 year, weekly bar chart. after that, you want to scroll down to the bottom where it says Commitment of Traders, window one. Select COT index as opposed to net positions, and put in 156 weeks (3 years).  Then in window two 2nd field option, select open interest.

This index is going to show the relative buying and selling of commercials (gold producers), large traders (hedge funds), and small speculators (self explanatory) over the past 3 years.

Lookie here! look at when commercials have gone relatively short the market, and when speculators of all creed have gone wildly bullish. Then to top it off, open interest. There is becoming excessive interest in the commodity, and the interest is coming from speculators.

The trend is still higher, and as such im still long (selling calls against the position). But the radars are up and beeping like none other. This is a market that wants its back to be broken. its also a fast market.

traders should be warned.

People continue to insist that what is really going on is somehow not happening. but it is

We continue to see the economy is pulling out of recession with Empire Manufaturing and Phili Fed survey turning positive. this hasnt happened since the bear market started in the first month of 2008.

“New orders nearly rose 6-1/2 points to 19.84 pointing to increasing activity in the months ahead. Delivery times slowed in the month, at 1.19 vs. a long run of negative readings. The gain in delivery time indicates congestion in the supply chain — confirmation of greater economic activity”

In addition to this, retail sales making their biggest month on month jump since 2006.

The yearly trend is making higher highs and higher lows. People dont want to see it, but the economy is improving and the recession, as Fed Chairman Bernanke said today, is possibly over.

The end of something or the start of something? many housing markets are starting to break their bear market trendlines or bumping up against them. So either we are due for another big dip, or we are going to start to see a slowing and eventually ending of the housing bear market. Cleveland is a fantastic example with the potential for a double bottom and trendline break. Dallas also has a similar look to it. Los Angeles is the furthest away from looking healthy.

I think this tells us about the state of the country and how the middle will fair better in the next economic advance. the Coastal areas will have to do some more languishing.

sources: Bespoke

Back from a much needed break, i felt looking at some economic, or ‘fundamental’ numbers in chart form would be fun.

looking first at new jobless claims, more of a leading indicator, we can see how trend in jobless claims moves the markets not on announcement days, but on a larger scale.

Now, lets take a look at our trendlines. typical technical analysis would point out that once you have 3 rising trendlines which get steeper each time, when the steepest breaks, the trend is breaking. this break happened in March/April 2009

As we can see, stocks started to rebound in this same time period.

Whats even more fascinating is it looks as though initial claims is forming a head and shoulders top, while the stock market looks to have broken out of an inverse head and shoulders bottom.

Unemployment claims just broke its steeper trendline just as the stock market broke out of its inverse head and shoulders bottom.

Nonfarm payrolls stopped making lower lows in January. meanwhile, the stock market declined till March.

This is important because as folks, like myself, make claims that the bear market is over, the economy will recover etc. etc. there will be an onslaught of people claiming that the stock market is not reflecting the economy, its just the separation of Wall St. and main St.

However, what we can actually see from these charts is that stocks are reflecting an actual oncoming recovery in the economy and that the decline after President Obama’s inauguration was a failed move lower. The market, aside from that failed move lower (confirmed by momentum divergences), has been in the range that it was in during the month of November for eight months. It has now broken out of that range.  Finally, to get more big picture,

This looks a tad familiar doesnt it? for those interested in Elliott Wave, there was a wave 3 move higher in unemployment during the 1974 crash and it peaked out during the 1975 rally. are we doing this again? Check the Charts on Yahoo Finance. The first leg down in the early 70’s, just as in 2000’s. then a rise back up to new highs–barely–then a crash down below the low, then a straight shot back up for about a year and a half, then stagnation for the next 6 years.

Will other markets, including unemployment, look the same? does that mean the dollar will not make a new low but gold will make new highs? as did in the late 70’s? have bonds topped out? is inflation (and the politics that come with it) on their way once again?

Stay tuned

What are we doing?

It dawned on me, seemingly out of no where. I, and most technical analysts, are looking at it all wrong. it should be so simple, so obvious, yet is disregarded every single day.

In a rising market, everyone–and i mean everyone–is looking for resistance levels. In a declining market, everyone is looking for support levels. if one were a range bound trader, this is probably the mindset needed. however, day in and day out i see trend followers doing the same thing. its pure insanity.

We preach that ‘the trend is your friend’, ‘for a rising trend to change to a declining one you need lower highs and lower lows’. Yet, a mindset of looking for resistance in an advance is the exact thought process that denies us the ability to follow trends. we have a self identity as trend followers, yet think with the mindset of a range bound trader.

This undoubtedly is a problem, if not an identity crisis.

No wonder so many people cant make money in the markets. ill often bring up that most people when looking at fundamentals miss the boat. that they have the mindset that they should just be able to look at a stock, and if its ‘cheap’ based on what they see, then the stock ’shouldnt’ go lower. Yet this is often the case (and Warren Buffett would say thats a silly assumption). Yet, we trend followers, chartists, technical analysis, we look at support and resistance levels in disregard for trend. if there is an upcoming resistance level in a rising market, that becomes the focus. even though we do not have evidence of lower highs and lower lows.

A New Motto

Support and Resistance is a derivative of trend. In an uptrend, we want to buy dips. Correct? This means resistance levels need not be of importance in a rising market. Instead, when the market rises we should be looking for the next support levels and not resistance levels. When a market is declining, we must stop obsessing with “when will it stop?” We should be looking at potential resistance levels as places to potentially initiate new short positions.

Fear and ego drives this identity crisis.

It sounds easy, but there is an internal drive that causes us to focus on levels and limits to the market as opposed to trend. We fear to death that we’ll be the fool who bought the top of the market, the hand ringing loser who sold at the bottom. So we “protect” ourselves by looking for evidence that the market is turning, that we should be exiting because of a level that the market shouldnt breach. we create fibonacci retracements and extensions, look at days of the month, momentum indicators, oscillators, prior levels the market turned at. we attach bollinger bands, keltner channels, resistance lines–we do whatever we can to constrain trends and put them in a neat little box.

Just doesnt work that way is all. doesnt help us make money. Im aware some, many…most, are actually not in the market to make money and there are deeper seated desires being sought out. I’m just attempting to not be one of them.

Ive spoke a lot on what to look for when trading breakouts. I now begin with what seems to be what indicates failed breakouts.

Something ive seen in a few failed breakout days is that there is a gap into the next trading session, this gap is filled and bull dosed through. Then the next day moves with the breakout, and then that day is reversed on the following day.

two examples:

With DSX i was put off from the start. ADX kept me out of the trade as this “breakout” was with the ADX above 25. they can happen with an ADX that high, i just dont like them nor am i interested in what will probably be a short move. in addition, a fellow trader had pointed out the real breakout was much lower around 13.5 with a triangle and an ADX around 10. i missed that.

With OXY however, just wasnt right. it broke out of a long channel. closed properly on that day. then gapped up, took out the gap, then moved higher but 66 was still resistance. i took profits and rolled stop up to break even. sure enough, next day i was stopped out.

DSX can also be explained on the weekly chart.

Here we see  the low ADX, the channel, it breaks out, but doesnt close in the top 77%. hell, it doesnt even close above the open. thats a failed breakout.

OXY from a weekly chart shows us perhaps it was a breakout on the weekly chart, showing the initial stop should have been placed at the low of the week, around $58ish

The hunt is on for further examples of what happens in the following days of a potential breakout day that turns into a failed breakout move.

Who says charts cant prophesies earnings?

In the past few months i have taken on a vastly new trading style and system. This involves a major market cycle. not one of timing, but of magnitude. it searches for narrow ranges, price patterns, and then seeks a structured way to exploit the breakout from this. Here are the follow blog posts on this system.

Banding Together

Tieing Bands Together

Large Range Days

BB/Kelt Set up

Alternative Option

Its my opinion that within these posts, one could easily learn to set up and trade markets on all timeframes, using all market instruments. it further only requires setting buy stops and being presant for the first and last hours of the trading session.

Of all the work ive put on this blog, as well as others that have yet to be posted on here, i believe this is my most complete and thorough strategy to date. Hopefully there are more to come and that it helps other traders find what they are searching for in the market.